EliminateIncomeTax.com
Navigation | ||||
Home | What's wrong with the USA? | Plea to President Obama |
Earned Income Tax Credit Loophole (you are here) |
Contact Me |
The Earned Income Credit (EIC) Loophole |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Let me explain. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Let's assume someone has absolutely no income, but they
"pretend" to be self-employed. For this example, we will use fingernail and toenail clipping business. Charge for this service $100.00. Owner: Generous Joe, the Nail Clipper. Let's say that Joe the nail clipper charges
Jane $100. After Jane gives Joe $100, generous Joe may
decide to make a gift of, oh let's say $100, right back to someone
in the Jane's immediate family. That's why Joe didn't deposit
the $100 into his bank. His records record the $100 sale along
with other sales that are very similar to this one. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Example 1: 3 sales @ $100/ea = $300.00. Net income = $270.00 ($300 minus $30 for the scissors)
So, Joe has paid nothing in as federal income tax but gets a refund of $94.00. That's not a lot of money, but wait! It gets worse. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Example 2: 20 sales @ $100/ea = $2,000.00. Net income = $1,970.00 ($2,000 minus $30 for the scissors)
In this case, Joe receives a refund of $343.00 (again, he paid nothing in). What happens if he earns even more??? We'll find out in Example 3. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Example 3: 100 sales @ $100/ea = $10,000.00. Net income = $9,940.00 ($10,000 minus $60 for the scissors -- needed two pair this time)
In this example, Joe the filer (both nail filer and income tax filer) will pay NO FEDERAL TAXES and yet receive a refund of $1,783.00. If Joe the filer has a dependent child, he would receive $2,223.00. In addition, Joe is contributing to Social Security by "paying" self-employment tax. Of course, Joe does not pay the tax -- the real taxpayers (like us) are paying it for him. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Example 4: 150 sales @ $100/ea = $15,000.00. Net income = $14,940.00 ($15,000 minus $60 for the two pair of scissors)
In this final example, Joe the filer has earned
nearly $15,000. This time, there is a big difference in the
refund depending on whether or not he has a dependent.
If Joe has a dependent, he will receive just about the
same amount as Example 3, when the nail sales were $10,000.
The primary difference is that the self-employment tax paid is a
whopping $2,111, and again, Joe the 'taxpayer' did not have to pay the
tax. Instead he receives a refund of $2,214. |
Some taxing
questions: Did Joe really have the nail business or
did he just pretend to run it in order to get the EIC tax refund?
Only your naildresser knows for sure. |
||
Disclaimer: I am not an
accountant or a tax attorney.
Therefore, I cannot comment on the legality of filing a return for a
nail-trimming business or some other so-called business. I do
not condone tax fraud. If you choose to file such a return, do
so at your own risk! I merely wanted to point out the fact that many people could be filing fraudulent returns and receiving a refund due to the way the Earned Income Tax Credit is set up. This is a tax loophole that should be closed.
If you have a comment or suggestion, please
contact me. Greg. |
|
|
Updated: 16 April 2009